at all reasoning and all proof is accomplished; if they posit nothing, they destroy discussion and all reasoning. Therefore with such men there is no reasoning. But as for those who are perplexed by the traditional difficulties, it is easy to meet them and to dissipate the causes of their perplexity. This is evident from what has been said.
It is manifest, therefore, from these arguments that contradictory statements cannot be truly made about the same subject at one time,Canada Goose Solaris Parka, nor can contrary statements, because every contrariety depends on privation. This is evident if we reduce the definitions of contraries to their principle.
Similarly, no intermediate between contraries can be predicated of one and the same subject, of which one of the contraries is predicated. If the subject is white we shall be wrong in saying it is neither black nor white, for then it follows that it is and is not white; for the second of the two terms we have put together is true of it,Los Angeles Galaxy Drakt, and this is the contradictory of white.
We could not be right,Damskie Barbour International Kurtka, then, in accepting the views either of Heraclitus or of Anaxagoras. If we were,Parajumpers Muži Deer, it would follow that contraries would be predicated of the same subject; for when Anaxagoras says that in everything there is a part of everything, he says nothing is sweet any more than it is bitter,Evergrande Taobao Drakt, and so with any other pair of contraries,CG Menn Ontario Parka, since in everything everything is present not potentially only, but actually and separately. And similarly all statements cannot be false nor all true,Air Jordan Retro 3 Damskie, both because of many other difficulties which might be adduced as arising from this position, and because if all are false it will not be true to say even this, and if all are true it will not be false to say all are false.
Book XI Chapter 7
Every science seeks certain principles and causes for each of its objects-e.g. medicine and gymnastics and each of the other sciences,Sverige Landslagsdrakt, whether productive or mathematical. For each of these marks off a certain class of things for itself and busies itself about this as about something existing and real,-not however qua real; the science that does this is another distinct from these. Of the sciences mentioned each gets somehow the ‘what’ in some class of things and tries to prove the other truths,Belstaff Coral Vent Bunda, with more or less precision. Some get the ‘what’ through perception, others by hypothesis; so that it is clear from an induction of this sort that there is no demonstration. of the substance or ‘what’.
There is a science of nature, and evidently it must be different both from practical and from productive science. For in the case of productive science the principle of movement is in the producer and not in the product,OGC Nice Drakt, and is either an art or some other faculty. And similarly in practical science the movement is not in the thing done, but rather in the doers. But the science of the natural philosopher deals with the things that have in themselves a principle of movement. It is clear from these facts,Moncler Marmelade, then,Hurricane Wd, that natural science must be neither practical nor productive, but theoretica
相关的主题文章：
http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi |
