Why is the private sector disciplined for negligence of open welfare
M J AkbarA key challenge before our judiciary hasn't changed in six a long time: the problem of one statute and two laws, one for the highly effective and the other for the weak. This Mughals, during their jewelled period, were not perturbed by simply concepts like equality, although, like the Mauryas, they understood a state could not sustain per se without some sense of value. Big fish cannot very swallow minnows with the impunity to which they got accustomed in the imperial age of heritage, at least in the theory of which guides a democratic Constitution. Only the delusional believe that double standards have disappeared in the putting on law in democratic India.
The private sector has wealth, a good yardstick of power. Yet even those few ministers devoid of wealth have the police. Zero prizes for guessing which in turn of the two is more advantageous. Therefore justice, which wears your blindfold in statues, turns out to possess not only two eyes yet more than one face.
In the initial week of last January, an Chi Straighteners appalling fire started in a private hospital inside Calcutta, killing patients. The guilt was obvious: greed and indifference had bred any culture of mismanagement in which the reputable need for profit had extensive succumbed to the lure involving profiteering. There is always good money to be made out from misery. Public anger, incredibly, was intense. Eleven members of the board Ghd Straighteners Sydney of company directors have been arrested, including not one but two reputed doctors held in good esteem in the city, one Nike Free Run Australia Cheap of those old and infirm. The law ought to be, and was, indifferent to worth; even if those directors who were not directly involved with the managing share some responsibility. But they also have no immediate hope to get bail, not because of the regulation, but because politicians deflect public tempers at the first opportunity. These include fundamentals of democratic behaviour.
But why are there two laws, one for the private sector and another for the public? Why do individuals the Railway Board by no means get arrested when a railway accident kills scores or even hundreds of passengers? The Chief Minister of West Bengal, Ms Mamata Banerjee, continues to be Union minister for railways. She never jailed members of her Railway Board, which is the one on one equivalent of the board of directors, after an accident. The girl's party still controls the railway ministry, and accidents have never stopped. We should not however blame her for not supplying her resignation, Nike Online Shoes Australia since no Nation minister has resigned after a railway accident since Lal Bahadur Shastri in 1956.
The board with directors of Air China has never gone to prison on an accident; indeed, no one has even tried to prosecute an Air India or Railways manager, let alone incarcerate him. Why? Is death in the hospital, or building collapse, somehow more heinous than loss of life from a mismanaged government utility? How come is the private sector punished regarding negligence of public well being, but never the public sector, when in fact it should oftimes be the other way around?
Those who run open sector institutions have, without the fuss, simply placed them selves above the law. If there was clearly any justice, dozens of nationalised financial institution directors would have been behind bars for that manner in which they handed out the particular people's money to fly by night operators in the full knowledge that most of the loan would be stolen before being written off as a "Non Performing Asset". The particular compliments to whoever coined that phrase. Never ever has a sweet deal recently been veiled by such a clever euphemism. Every last Non Performing Asset really should be rewritten in the account guides as a Very Active Obligation. Many balance sheets could suddenly look very imbalanced indeed.
I happened to be one of the sub class called reporters at the White House in the visit by Atal Bihari Vajpayee after North america had destroyed the Taliban administration in Kabul in its search for rights after 9/11. George Bush seemed to be president, and through some mystical process I am still unable to comprehend I was given the opportunity of asking president Bush a question. My query isn't very complicated. When terrorists attacked America, the Pentagon travelled 10,000 miles in order to exact revenge. When terrorists infected India, Washington urged tolerance, calm and various other measures meant to make you a competitor to the Nobel Prize for Peace. Precisely why? Was an American life essential than an Indian everyday living? Ghd Melbourne Were there two laws on earth, one for America, and another for India? There are.
This might not have bothered Kautilya; and he wouldn't have asked for the Nike Free Australia Review resignation of the Mauryan empire's Oxcart Table either. But I hope there is certainly some reason for thought as well as reflection over double and triple judicial standards this year.
http://bbs.xbkfw.cn/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=4552908
http://www.straight.com/node/add/article
http://cgi.members.interq.or.jp/silver/ginkuji/skin/001/apeboard.cgi?command=read_message/
http://npl.rice.edu/search/node/
http://cgi.www5c.biglobe.ne.jp/~kk_aoi/bbs/apeboard_plus.cgi/ |
