and the dark man, not even if each of them be denoted by one word. For man is here being considered on his material side, and matter does not create a difference; for it does not make individual men species of man, though the flesh and the bones of which this man and that man consist are other. The concrete thing is other,Moncler Gresselle, but not other in species, because in the definition there is no contrariety. This is the ultimate indivisible kind. Callias is definition + matter,Dame Moncler Grillon, the pale man, then,PJS Dameklær Alisee' 6 Parkas, is so also, because it is the individual Callias that is pale; man,Air Jordan Retro 7 Damskie, then, is pale only incidentally. Neither do a brazen and a wooden circle, then, differ in species; and if a brazen triangle and a wooden circle differ in species, it is not because of the matter, but because there is a contrariety in the definition. But does the matter not make things other in species,Thiago Silva Drakt, when it is other in a certain way, or is there a sense in which it does? For why is this horse other than this man in species, although their matter is included with their definitions? Doubtless because there is a contrariety in the definition. For while there is a contrariety also between pale man and dark horse,Parajumpers Muži Kodiak, and it is a contrariety in species, it does not depend on the paleness of the one and the darkness of the other,Andres Iniesta Drakt, since even if both had been pale,Fox Fur Czyścibut 5531, yet they would have been other in species. But male and female, while they are modifications peculiar to ‘animal’, are so not in virtue of its essence but in the matter, ie. the body. This is why the same seed becomes female or male by being acted on in a certain way. We have stated, then, what it is to be other in species, and why some things differ in species and others do not.
Book X Chapter 10
Since contraries are other in form,Shorty Yd, and the perishable and the imperishable are contraries (for privation is a determinate incapacity), the perishable and the imperishable must be different in kind.
Now so far we have spoken of the general terms themselves,Sokker, so that it might be thought not to be necessary that every imperishable thing should be different from every perishable thing in form,White Caps FC Drakt, just as not every pale thing is different in form from every dark thing. For the same thing can be both, and even at the same time if it is a universal (e.g. man can be both pale and dark), and if it is an individual it can still be both; for the same man can be, though not at the same time, pale and dark. Yet pale is contrary to dark.
But while some contraries belong to certain things by accident (e.g. both those now mentioned and many others), others cannot, and among these are ‘perishable’ and ‘imperishable’. For nothing is by accident perishable. For what is accidental is capable of not being present, but perishableness is one of the attributes that belong of necessity to the things to which they belong; or else one and the same thing may be perishable and imperishable,Parajumpers Männer Maine Eco Jacken Schweiz, if perishableness is capable of not belonging to it. Perishableness then must either be the essence or be present in the essence of each perisha
相关的主题文章：
http://www.matsue-yado.com/otoku/clip.cgi
http://www.rastafarispeaks.com/repatriation/index.cgi
http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi |
