things and Wisdom is concerned with them. For we seem to seek another kind of substance, and this is our problem, i.e. to see if there is Tampa Bay Lightning Pelipaidat something which can exist apart by itself and belongs to no sensible thing.-Further, if there is another substance apart from San Jose Sharks Pelipaidat and corresponding to sensible substances, which kinds of sensible substance must be supposed to have this corresponding to them? Why should one suppose men or horses to have it, more than either the other animals or even all lifeless things? On the other hand to set up other and eternal substances Paris Saint-Germain Fodboldtrøjer equal in number to the sensible and perishable substances would seem to Eder Jersey fall beyond the bounds of probability.-But George John Jersey if the principle we now seek is not separable from corporeal things, what has a better claim to the name matter? This, however, does not exist in actuality, but exists in potency. And it would seem rather that the form or shape is a more important principle than this; but the form is perishable, so that there is no eternal substance at Benfica Tröja all which can exist apart and independent. But this is paradoxical; for such a principle and substance seems to exist and is sought by nearly all the Jack Harrison Jersey most refined Daniel Sturridge Jersey thinkers as something that exists; for how is there to BVB Borussia Dortmund Dam be order unless there is something eternal and independent and permanent?
Further, if there is a substance or principle of such a nature as that which we are Nike Free 4.0 V2 now seeking, and if this is one for all things, and the same for eternal and for perishable things, it is hard to say why in the world, if there is the same principle, some of the things that fall under the principle Nike Air Max 2016 Moški are eternal, and others are not eternal; this is paradoxical. But if there is one principle of perishable and another of eternal things, we shall be in a like difficulty if the principle of perishable things, as well as that of eternal, is eternal; for why, if the principle is eternal, are not the things that fall under the principle also eternal? But if it is perishable another principle is involved to account for it, and another to account for that, and this will go on Angus Gunn Jersey to infinity.
If on the other hand we are to set up what are thought to be the most unchangeable principles, being and unity, firstly, if each of these does not indicate a ‘this’ or substance, how will they be separable and independent? Yet we expect the eternal and primary principles to be so. But if each of them does signify a ‘this’ or substance, all things that are are substances; for being is predicated of all things (and unity also of some); but that all things that are are substance is false. Further, how can they be right who say that the first principle is unity and this is substance, and generate number as the first product from unity and from matter, assert that number is substance? How are we to think of ‘two’, and each of the other numbers composed of units, as one? On this point neither do they say anything nor is it easy to say anything. But if we are to suppose lines or what comes after these (I mean the primary surfaces) to be principles,links:
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi
http://www.rastafarispeaks.com/repatriation/index.cgi
http://www.ticovision.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi |
