ng is said to be one, these terms also will have many senses, but yet it belongs to one science to know them all; for a term belongs to different sciences not if it has different senses, but if it has not one meaning and its definitions cannot be referred to one central meaning. And since all things are referred to that which is primary, as for instance all things which are called one are referred to the primary one, we must say that this holds good also of the same and the other and of contraries in general; so that after distinguishing the various senses of each, we must then explain by reference Maillot Roumanie to what is primary in the case of each of the predicates in Grant Fuhr Tröja question, saying how they England Dresy are related to it; for some will Timo Meier Tröjor be called what they are called because they possess it, others because they produce it, and others in other such ways.
It is evident, then, that Dánsko Dresy it belongs to one science to be able to give an account of these concepts as well as of substance (this was one of the questions in our book of problems), and that it is the function of the philosopher to be able to investigate all things. For if it is not the function of the philosopher, who is it who will inquire whether Socrates Kurtka Peuterey Kobiety Luna Yd and Socrates seated are the same thing, or whether one thing has one contrary, or what contrariety is, or how many meanings it has? And similarly with all other such questions. Since, then, these are essential modifications of unity qua unity and of being qua being, not qua numbers or lines or fire, it is clear that it belongs to this science to investigate both the essence of these concepts and their properties. And those who study these properties err not by leaving the sphere of philosophy, but by forgetting that substance, of which they have no correct idea, is prior to these other things. For number qua number has peculiar attributes, such as Jacques Plante Tröja oddness and evenness, commensurability and equality, excess and defect, and these belong to numbers either in themselves or in relation to one another. And similarly the solid and the motionless and that which is in motion and the weightless and that which has weight have other peculiar properties. So too there are certain properties peculiar to being as such, and it is about these that the philosopher has to investigate the truth.-An indication of this may be mentioned: dialecticians and sophists assume the same guise as the philosopher, for sophistic is Wisdom which exists only in semblance, and dialecticians embrace all things in their dialectic, and being is common to all things; but evidently their dialectic embraces these subjects because these are proper to philosophy.-For sophistic and dialectic turn on Dominic Moore Tröja the same class of things as philosophy, but this differs from Evgeny Kuznetsov Tröja dialectic in the nature of the faculty required and from sophistic in respect of the purpose Kawasaki Frontale Dresy of the philosophic life. Dialectic is merely critical where philosophy claims to know, and sophistic is what appears Michal Rozsival Tröjor to be philosophy but is not.
Again, in Felix Potvin Tröja the list of contraries one of the two columns is privative, and all contlinks:
http://www13.plala.or.jp/white_roots/gwbbs/gwbbs.cgi
http://www012.upp.so-net.ne.jp/ad-lib/bbs/index.cgi
http://www.myip.cn/cgimage.lv |
