ows.
Book V Chapter 20
‘Having’ means (1) a kind of activity of the haver and of what he has-something like an action or movement. For when one thing makes and one is made, between them there is a making; so too between him who has a POLO France garment and the garment which he has there is a Maillot Japon having. This POLO AC Milan sort of having, then, evidently we cannot have; for the process will go on to infinity, if it is to be possible to have the having of what we have.-(2) ‘Having’ or ‘habit’ means a disposition according to which that which is disposed is either well or ill disposed, and either in itself or with reference to something else; e.g. health is a ‘habit’; for it is such a disposition.-(3) We speak of a ‘habit’ if there is a portion of such a disposition; and so even the excellence of the parts is a ‘habit’ of the whole thing.
Book V Chapter 21
‘Affection’ Brian Leetch Tröja means (1) a quality in respect of which a thing can be altered, e.g. white and black, sweet and bitter, heaviness and lightness, and all others of the kind.-(2) The actualization of these-the already accomplished alterations.-(3) Especially, injurious Evander Kane Tröjor alterations and movements, and, above all painful injuries.-(4) Misfortunes and painful experiences when on a large scale are called affections.
Book V Chapter 22
We speak of ‘privation’ (1) if something has not one of the attributes which a thing might naturally have, even if this thing itself would not naturally have it; e.g. a plant is said to be ‘deprived’ of eyes.-(2) If, though either the thing itself or its genus would naturally have an attribute, it has it not; e.g. a blind man Northern Irsko Dresy and a mole are in different senses ‘deprived’ of sight; the latter in contrast with its genus, the former Manchester United Femme in contrast with his own normal nature.-(3) If, though it would naturally have the attribute, and when it would naturally have it, it has it not; for blindness is a privation, but one is not ‘blind’ at any and every age, but only if one has not sight at the age at which Atlético Madrid one would naturally have it. Similarly a thing is called blind if it has not sight in the medium in which, and in respect of the organ in respect of which, and with reference to the object with reference to which, and in the circumstances in which, it would naturally have it.-(4) The violent taking away of anything is called privation.
Indeed there are just as many kinds of privations as there are of words with negative prefixes; for a thing is called unequal because it has not equality though it Orlando Dresy would naturally have it, and invisible either because it has no Kostarika Dresy colour at all or because it has a poor colour, and apodous either because it has no feet at all or because it has imperfect feet. Again, a privative term may be used because the thing has little of the attribute (and this means having it in a sense imperfectly), e.g. ‘kernel-less’; or because it has it not easily or not well (e.g. we call a thing uncuttable not Kurtki Barbour only if it cannot be cut but also if it cannot be cut easily or well); or because it POLO Espagne has not the attribute at all; flinks:
http://www.olginfo.com/discuz/viewthread.php?tid=676760&pid=801162&page=3&extra=page%3D1#pid801162
http://www13.plala.or.jp/gakuki3/cgi_bin/aska/aska.cgi
http://www.dwats.com/cgi-bin/index.cgi |
